|
DEMING FITName:
where \( y_{i} \) has measurement error \( \epsilon_{i} \) and \( x_{i} \) has measurement error \( \tau_{i} \). It is assumed that the \( \epsilon \) and \( \tau \) errors are independent of each other and that both have normal distributions with a mean of zero. If the two measurement processes are equal, the slope should be approximately equal to one and the intercept should be approximately equal to zero. Let \( \delta \) equal the ratio of the variances of \( \epsilon \) and \( \tau \). This ratio is typically assumed to be known (possibly from prior data). If prior data is not available, estimates of these variances can be determined if we have multiple measurements for each \( i \). In that case, the variances can be estimated with
\( s_{\epsilon}^2 = \sum_{i=1}^{n}{\sum_{j=1}^{m_{i}} {\frac{(y_{ij} - \bar{y}_{i})^2} {\sum_{i=1}^{n}{m_{i}-1}}}} \) with \( k_{i} \) denoting the number of replications for \( x_{i} \) and \( m_{} \) the number of replications for \( y_{i} \), respectively. Then
Note that \( k_{i} \) does not need to equal \( m_{i} \), but all \( k_{i} \) and \( m_{i} \) should be greater than one. Also, the means for \( x_{i} \) and \( y_{i} \) are used in the DEMING FIT command. If prior estimates of the variances are not available and we do not have replicate measurements, the following ratio will be used by default
where \( SS_{x} \) and \( SS_{y} \) are defined below. Alternatively, you can chose to set \( \delta \) to 1 (i.e., we assume equal error variances for both measurement processes). The estimates for \( \beta \) and \( \alpha \) are:
\( \alpha = \bar{y} - \beta \bar{x} \) where
\( SS_{x} = \sum_{i=1}^{n}{(x_{i} - \bar{x})^2} \) \( SS_{xy} = \sum_{i=1}^{n}{(x_{i} - \bar{x})(y_{i} - \bar{y})} \) The estimated "true" values for \( x_{i} \) and \( y_{i} \) are
\( \hat{y}_{i} = y_{i} - \frac{e_{i}} {\delta \beta^2 + 1} \) The \( e_{i} \) are the "raw" residuals
In addition to the raw residuals, the following residuals are defined
Dataplot generates the following outputs
If the hypothesis that the slope is equal to one and the means of the two processes are equal, this provides evidence that the two measurement processes can be considered equivalent. Additional information is written to files. Specifically,
This procedure was popularized by Deming which is why it is commonly referred to as Deming regression. However, it was initially developed by Adcock and Kummell. The Deming regression assumes that the ratio of the variances (i.e., the delta) is constant across the range of the measurements. If this assumption is not met, then a weighted Deming regression may provide a better fit. Dataplot uses the weighting scheme recommended by Linnet. Specifically,
Then the formulas for \( SS_y \), \(SS_x \) and \( SS_{xy} \) are updated to use the weights
\( SS_{x} = \sum_{i=1}^{n}{w_{i}(x_{i} - \bar{x_w})^2} \) \( SS_{xy} = \sum_{i=1}^{n}{w_{i}(x_{i} - \bar{x_w}) w_{i}(y_{i} - \bar{y_w})} \) where \( \bar{y_w} \) and \( \bar{x_w} \) are the weighted means.
\( \bar{x_w} = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}{w_{i} x_{i}}} {\sum_{i=1}^{n}{w_{i}}} \) Optionally, an iterative reweighting scheme can be be employed to fine tune the weights. The algorithm for this (suggested by Linnett) is
where <y> is the response variable for the first measurement process; <x> is the response variable for the second measurement process; and where the <SUBSET/EXCEPT/FOR qualification> is optional. This syntax performs the unweighted Deming fit.
<SUBSET/EXCEPT/FOR qualification> where <y> is the response variable for the first measurement process; <x> is the response variable for the second measurement process; and where the <SUBSET/EXCEPT/FOR qualification> is optional. This syntax performs the weighted Deming fit.
<SUBSET/EXCEPT/FOR qualification> where <y> is the response variable for the first measurement process; <x1> is the group-id variable for the first measurement process; <y2> is the response variable for the second measurement process; <x2> is the group-id variable for the second measurement process; and where the <SUBSET/EXCEPT/FOR qualification> is optional. This syntax is used when there is replication in the data. The advantage of replication is that a more accurate estimate of \( \delta \) can be obtained. The <y1> and <x1> variables should be of the same length and the <y2> and <x2> variables should be of the same length. However, <y1> and <y2> do not need to be the same length. The <x1> and <x2> group-id variables should have the same group-id's and each group should have at least two values. Note that average, rather than the individual observations, for each group is used in the Deming fit.
<SUBSET/EXCEPT/FOR qualification> where <y> is the response variable for the first measurement process; <x1> is the group-id variable for the first measurement process; <y2> is the response variable for the second measurement process; <x2> is the group-id variable for the second measurement process; and where the <SUBSET/EXCEPT/FOR qualification> is optional. This syntax is similar to Syntax 3. However, the weighted Deming fit is used.
DEMING FIT Y X SUBSET TAG > 1 WEIGHTED DEMING FIT Y X REPLICATED DEMING FIT Y1 X1 Y2 X2
To specify that delta should be computed from the data, enter a negative value for DELTA. Using a value of 1 specifies that the variances from the two measurement processes are equal.
To turn off the iterative reweighting, set this switch to OFF. The default is OFF. To specificy the threshold for determining convergence, enter the command
The default is 0.00005.
REPLICATED WEIGHTED DEMING FIT
Kummel (1879), "Reduction of observation equations which contain more than one observed quantity," The Analyst, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 97-105. Deming (1943), "Statistical Adjustment of Data," John Wiley and Sons. Linnet (1990), "Estimation of the linear relationship between the measurements of two methods with proportional errors," Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 12, pp. 1463-1473. Linnet (1993), "Evaluation of Regression Procedures for Method Comparison Studies," Clinical Chemistry, 39 (3), pp. 424-432. NCSS (2016), "Deming Regression," https://www.ncss.com/wp-content/themes/ncss/pdf/Procedures/NCSS/Deming_Regression.pdf.
. Step 1: Define the Input Data, example from NCSS web site
.
read x y
7.0 7.9
8.3 8.2
10.5 9.6
9.0 9.0
5.1 6.5
8.2 7.3
10.2 10.2
10.3 10.6
7.1 6.3
5.9 5.2
end of data
let n = size x
.
. Step 2: Perform the Deming Regression
.
set list new window off
let delta = 4
deming fit y x
print " "
print " "
list dpst1f.dat
print " "
print " "
list dpst4f.dat
|
|
The following output is generated
Deming Fit (Non-Weighted Case)
Y versus X
Number of Observations: 10
Delta (Ratio of Variances): 4.00000
Sum of Squares Y: 19.40000
Sum of Squares X: 26.20889
Sum of Squares XY: 20.24000
Estimate of Intercept: -0.08974
SD(Intercept): 1.72199
Jacknife Estimate of Intercept: -0.04481
Estimate of Slope: 1.00119
SD(Slope): 0.18718
Jacknife Estimate of Slope: 0.99766
Ybar: 8.08000
Xbar: 8.16000
Ybar-Xbar: -0.08000
SD(Ybar-Xbar): 0.22988
Jacknife Estimate of Ybar-Xbar: -0.08000
Confidence Interval for the Intercept
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidence t t-Value X Lower Upper
Value (%) Value StdErr Limit Limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
90.000 1.85955 3.20212 -3.29186 3.11237
95.000 2.30600 3.97091 -4.06066 3.88117
99.000 3.35539 5.77794 -5.86768 5.68819
Confidence Interval for the Slope
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidence t t-Value X Lower Upper
Value (%) Value StdErr Limit Limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
90.000 1.85955 0.34806 0.65313 1.34926
95.000 2.30600 0.43163 0.56956 1.43283
99.000 3.35539 0.62805 0.37314 1.62925
Two-Tailed Test for Slope Equal to One
H0: Beta = 1; Ha: Beta <> 1
------------------------------------------------------------
Null
Significance Test Critical Hypothesis
Level Statistic Value (+/-) Conclusion
------------------------------------------------------------
90.0% 0.00638 1.83311 ACCEPT
95.0% 0.00638 2.26216 ACCEPT
99.0% 0.00638 3.24984 ACCEPT
Two-Tailed Test for Ybar - Xbar = 0
H0: Ybar - Xbar = 0; Ha: Ybar - Xbar <> 0
------------------------------------------------------------
Null
Significance Test Critical Hypothesis
Level Statistic Value (+/-) Conclusion
------------------------------------------------------------
90.0% -0.34801 1.83311 ACCEPT
95.0% -0.34801 2.26216 ACCEPT
99.0% -0.34801 3.24984 ACCEPT
OPTIMIZED
X-HAT Y-HAT RAW RESIDUAL X RESIDUAL Y RESIDUAL RESIDUAL PREDICTED Y|X
0.7784546E+01 0.7704097E+01 0.9813853E+00 -0.7845459E+00 0.1959025E+00 0.8769398E+00 0.6918615E+01
0.8283878E+01 0.8204026E+01 -0.2016719E-01 0.1612220E-01 -0.4025742E-02 0.1802087E-01 0.8220167E+01
0.9842236E+01 0.9764245E+01 -0.8227945E+00 0.6577641E+00 -0.1642449E+00 0.7352273E+00 0.1042279E+02
0.9063152E+01 0.8984231E+01 0.7899685E-01 -0.6315221E-01 0.1576922E-01 0.7058948E-01 0.8921003E+01
0.6286073E+01 0.6203835E+01 0.1483654E+01 -0.1186073E+01 0.2961646E+00 0.1325754E+01 0.5016346E+01
0.7544432E+01 0.7463697E+01 -0.8200478E+00 0.6555683E+00 -0.1636966E+00 0.7327729E+00 0.8120048E+01
0.1026201E+02 0.1018452E+02 0.7756378E-01 -0.6200657E-01 0.1548315E-01 0.6930893E-01 0.1012244E+02
0.1060174E+02 0.1052466E+02 0.3774444E+00 -0.3017392E+00 0.7534482E-01 0.3372742E+00 0.1022256E+02
0.6525425E+01 0.6443473E+01 -0.7187341E+00 0.5745754E+00 -0.1434725E+00 0.6422417E+00 0.7018734E+01
0.5406513E+01 0.5323225E+01 -0.6173010E+00 0.4934871E+00 -0.1232246E+00 0.5516038E+00 0.5817301E+01
PREDICTED LOWER UPPER LOWER UPPER LOWER UPPER
X(I) STANDARD ERROR 90% CI 90% CI 95% CI 95% CI 99% CI 99% CI
0.7000000E+01 0.4602022E+00 0.6062847E+01 0.7774383E+01 0.5857387E+01 0.7979843E+01 0.5374458E+01 0.8462771E+01
0.8300000E+01 0.2801083E+00 0.7699292E+01 0.8741042E+01 0.7574236E+01 0.8866098E+01 0.7280295E+01 0.9160039E+01
0.1050000E+02 0.3501491E+00 0.9771675E+01 0.1107391E+02 0.9615349E+01 0.1123024E+02 0.9247909E+01 0.1159768E+02
0.9000000E+01 0.2360495E+00 0.8482058E+01 0.9359949E+01 0.8376672E+01 0.9465334E+01 0.8128966E+01 0.9713041E+01
0.5100000E+01 0.7871850E+00 0.3552537E+01 0.6480154E+01 0.3201094E+01 0.6831598E+01 0.2375035E+01 0.7657657E+01
0.8200000E+01 0.2907099E+00 0.7579459E+01 0.8660637E+01 0.7449669E+01 0.8790426E+01 0.7144603E+01 0.9095492E+01
0.1020000E+02 0.3108288E+00 0.9544435E+01 0.1070044E+02 0.9405664E+01 0.1083921E+02 0.9079485E+01 0.1116539E+02
0.1030000E+02 0.3233838E+00 0.9621208E+01 0.1082390E+02 0.9476831E+01 0.1096828E+02 0.9137478E+01 0.1130763E+02
0.7100000E+01 0.4442138E+00 0.6192697E+01 0.7844771E+01 0.5994375E+01 0.8043093E+01 0.5528225E+01 0.8509244E+01
0.5900000E+01 0.6458274E+00 0.4616354E+01 0.7018248E+01 0.4328020E+01 0.7306582E+01 0.3650300E+01 0.7984302E+01
|
.
. Step 3: Generate some diagnostic plots
.
skip 2
set read format 60X,2e15.7
read dpst4f.dat pred95l pred95u
skip 0
set read format
.
let alpha = round(alpha,4)
let beta = round(beta,4)
title offset 8
title Deming Fit of Y versus Xcr()Model: Y = ^alpha + ^beta*x
y1label Y
x1label X
.
line blank solid dotted dotted
character circle blank blank blank
character hw 1.0 0.75
character fill on
.
plot y x and
plot pred x and
plot pred95l x and
plot pred95u x
.
.
set 4plot multiplot on
multiplot corner coordinates 5 5 95 95
character hw 2 1.5
tic mark label size 4
label
title
.
4-plot res
justification center
move 50 98
text 4-Plot of Optimized Residuals
Program 2:
. Step 1: Define the Input Data
.
read x y
7.0 7.9
8.3 8.2
10.5 9.6
9.0 9.0
5.1 6.5
8.2 7.3
10.2 10.2
10.3 10.6
7.1 6.3
5.9 5.2
end of data
.
. Step 2: Perform the Deming Regression
.
let delta = 4
deming fit y x
weighted deming fit y x
set deming fit iterative reweighting on
weighted deming fit y x
The following output is generated
Unweighted Deming Fit (Standard Errors by Jackknife)
Y versus X
Number of Observations: 10
Delta (Ratio of Variances): 4.00000
Sum of Squares Y: 28.61600
Sum of Squares X: 31.88400
Sum of Squares XY: 27.47200
Residual Standard Deviation: 0.83416
Estimate of Intercept: -0.08974
SD(Intercept): 1.72199
Jacknife Estimate of Intercept: -0.04481
Estimate of Slope: 1.00119
SD(Slope): 0.18718
Jacknife Estimate of Slope: 0.99766
Ybar: 8.08000
Xbar: 8.16000
Ybar-Xbar: -0.08000
SD(Ybar-Xbar): 0.24846
Jacknife Estimate of Ybar-Xbar: -1.52000
Confidence Interval for the Intercept
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidence t t-Value X Lower Upper
Value (%) Value StdErr Limit Limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
90.000 1.85955 3.20212 -3.29186 3.11237
95.000 2.30600 3.97091 -4.06066 3.88117
99.000 3.35539 5.77794 -5.86768 5.68819
Confidence Interval for the Slope
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidence t t-Value X Lower Upper
Value (%) Value StdErr Limit Limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
90.000 1.85955 0.34806 0.65313 1.34926
95.000 2.30600 0.43163 0.56956 1.43283
99.000 3.35539 0.62805 0.37314 1.62925
Two-Tailed Test for Slope Equal to One
H0: Beta = 1; Ha: Beta <> 1
------------------------------------------------------------
Null
Significance Test Critical Hypothesis
Level Statistic Value (+/-) Conclusion
------------------------------------------------------------
90.0% 0.00638 1.83311 ACCEPT
95.0% 0.00638 2.26216 ACCEPT
99.0% 0.00638 3.24984 ACCEPT
Two-Tailed Test for Ybar - Xbar = 0
H0: Ybar - Xbar = 0; Ha: Ybar - Xbar <> 0
------------------------------------------------------------
Null
Significance Test Critical Hypothesis
Level Statistic Value (+/-) Conclusion
------------------------------------------------------------
90.0% -0.32198 1.83311 ACCEPT
95.0% -0.32198 2.26216 ACCEPT
99.0% -0.32198 3.24984 ACCEPT
Weighted Deming Fit (Standard Errors by Jackknife)
Y versus X
Number of Observations: 10
Delta (Ratio of Variances): 4.00000
Sum of Squares Y: 0.48269
Sum of Squares X: 0.52677
Sum of Squares XY: 0.44519
Residual Standard Deviation: 0.85586
Estimate of Intercept: -0.32512
SD(Intercept): 1.96090
Jacknife Estimate of Intercept: -0.53165
Estimate of Slope: 1.03093
SD(Slope): 0.21892
Jacknife Estimate of Slope: 1.05630
Ybar: 7.34390
Xbar: 7.43896
Ybar-Xbar: -0.09505
SD(Ybar-Xbar): 0.33413
Jacknife Estimate of Ybar-Xbar: -1.79903
Confidence Interval for the Intercept
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidence t t-Value X Lower Upper
Value (%) Value StdErr Limit Limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
90.000 1.85955 3.64640 -3.97152 3.32128
95.000 2.30600 4.52185 -4.84697 4.19673
99.000 3.35539 6.57959 -6.90472 6.25447
Confidence Interval for the Slope
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidence t t-Value X Lower Upper
Value (%) Value StdErr Limit Limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
90.000 1.85955 0.40710 0.62383 1.43802
95.000 2.30600 0.50483 0.52609 1.53576
99.000 3.35539 0.73457 0.29636 1.76550
Two-Tailed Test for Slope Equal to One
H0: Beta = 1; Ha: Beta <> 1
------------------------------------------------------------
Null
Significance Test Critical Hypothesis
Level Statistic Value (+/-) Conclusion
------------------------------------------------------------
90.0% 0.14127 1.83311 ACCEPT
95.0% 0.14127 2.26216 ACCEPT
99.0% 0.14127 3.24984 ACCEPT
Two-Tailed Test for Ybar - Xbar = 0
H0: Ybar - Xbar = 0; Ha: Ybar - Xbar <> 0
------------------------------------------------------------
Null
Significance Test Critical Hypothesis
Level Statistic Value (+/-) Conclusion
------------------------------------------------------------
90.0% -0.28448 1.83311 ACCEPT
95.0% -0.28448 2.26216 ACCEPT
99.0% -0.28448 3.24984 ACCEPT
THE FORTRAN COMMON CHARACTER VARIABLE DEMI FIT HAS JUST BEEN SET TO ON
Iterative Weighted Deming Fit (Standard Errors by Jackknife)
Y versus X
Number of Observations: 10
Delta (Ratio of Variances): 4.00000
Sum of Squares Y: 0.48285
Sum of Squares X: 0.52659
Sum of Squares XY: 0.44523
Residual Standard Deviation: 0.85609
Estimate of Intercept: -0.32838
SD(Intercept): 1.95830
Jacknife Estimate of Intercept: -0.53688
Estimate of Slope: 1.03123
SD(Slope): 0.21865
Jacknife Estimate of Slope: 1.05680
Ybar: 7.34363
Xbar: 7.43968
Ybar-Xbar: -0.09605
SD(Ybar-Xbar): 0.33370
Jacknife Estimate of Ybar-Xbar: -1.81777
Confidence Interval for the Intercept
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidence t t-Value X Lower Upper
Value (%) Value StdErr Limit Limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
90.000 1.85955 3.64155 -3.96992 3.31317
95.000 2.30600 4.51584 -4.84422 4.18747
99.000 3.35539 6.57085 -6.89922 6.24247
Confidence Interval for the Slope
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidence t t-Value X Lower Upper
Value (%) Value StdErr Limit Limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
90.000 1.85955 0.40659 0.62463 1.43782
95.000 2.30600 0.50421 0.52702 1.53544
99.000 3.35539 0.73366 0.29757 1.76489
Two-Tailed Test for Slope Equal to One
H0: Beta = 1; Ha: Beta <> 1
------------------------------------------------------------
Null
Significance Test Critical Hypothesis
Level Statistic Value (+/-) Conclusion
------------------------------------------------------------
90.0% 0.14282 1.83311 ACCEPT
95.0% 0.14282 2.26216 ACCEPT
99.0% 0.14282 3.24984 ACCEPT
Two-Tailed Test for Ybar - Xbar = 0
H0: Ybar - Xbar = 0; Ha: Ybar - Xbar <> 0
------------------------------------------------------------
Null
Significance Test Critical Hypothesis
Level Statistic Value (+/-) Conclusion
------------------------------------------------------------
90.0% -0.28783 1.83311 ACCEPT
95.0% -0.28783 2.26216 ACCEPT
99.0% -0.28783 3.24984 ACCEPT
Program 3:
. Step 1: Read the data. This data is from the
. R package "deming".
.
skip 25
read ferritin.dat id period y1 y2
.
let delta = 1
deming fit y1 y2
weighted deming fit y1 y2
set deming fit iterative reweighting on
weighted deming fit y1 y2
The following output is generated
Unweighted Deming Fit (Standard Errors by Jackknife)
Y1 versus Y2
Number of Observations: 162
Delta (Ratio of Variances): 1.00000
Sum of Squares Y: 6234908.53975
Sum of Squares X: 6711375.16623
Sum of Squares XY: 6446538.77506
Residual Standard Deviation: 16.35996
Estimate of Intercept: 5.21567
SD(Intercept): 2.18603
Jacknife Estimate of Intercept: 5.45149
Estimate of Slope: 0.96373
SD(Slope): 0.02505
Jacknife Estimate of Slope: 0.96113
Ybar: 129.80123
Xbar: 129.27469
Ybar-Xbar: 0.52654
SD(Ybar-Xbar): 1.42827
Jacknife Estimate of Ybar-Xbar: 170.07346
Confidence Interval for the Intercept
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidence t t-Value X Lower Upper
Value (%) Value StdErr Limit Limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
90.000 1.65443 3.61663 1.59904 8.83231
95.000 1.97490 4.31719 0.89849 9.53286
99.000 2.60691 5.69876 -0.48309 10.91444
Confidence Interval for the Slope
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidence t t-Value X Lower Upper
Value (%) Value StdErr Limit Limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
90.000 1.65443 0.04144 0.92229 1.00516
95.000 1.97490 0.04946 0.91427 1.01319
99.000 2.60691 0.06529 0.89844 1.02902
Two-Tailed Test for Slope Equal to One
H0: Beta = 1; Ha: Beta <> 1
------------------------------------------------------------
Null
Significance Test Critical Hypothesis
Level Statistic Value (+/-) Conclusion
------------------------------------------------------------
90.0% -1.44828 1.65437 ACCEPT
95.0% -1.44828 1.97481 ACCEPT
99.0% -1.44828 2.60671 ACCEPT
Two-Tailed Test for Ybar - Xbar = 0
H0: Ybar - Xbar = 0; Ha: Ybar - Xbar <> 0
------------------------------------------------------------
Null
Significance Test Critical Hypothesis
Level Statistic Value (+/-) Conclusion
------------------------------------------------------------
90.0% 0.36866 1.65437 ACCEPT
95.0% 0.36866 1.97481 ACCEPT
99.0% 0.36866 2.60671 ACCEPT
Weighted Deming Fit (Standard Errors by Jackknife)
Y1 versus Y2
Number of Observations: 162
Delta (Ratio of Variances): 1.00000
Sum of Squares Y: 138.19075
Sum of Squares X: 130.15446
Sum of Squares XY: 133.65215
Residual Standard Deviation: 22.00621
Estimate of Intercept: -0.02616
SD(Intercept): 0.03322
Jacknife Estimate of Intercept: -0.03267
Estimate of Slope: 1.03052
SD(Slope): 0.00626
Jacknife Estimate of Slope: 1.03071
Ybar: 4.16195
Xbar: 4.06408
Ybar-Xbar: 0.09786
SD(Ybar-Xbar): 0.15216
Jacknife Estimate of Ybar-Xbar: 31.69897
Confidence Interval for the Intercept
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidence t t-Value X Lower Upper
Value (%) Value StdErr Limit Limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
90.000 1.65443 0.05496 -0.08112 0.02880
95.000 1.97490 0.06560 -0.09176 0.03945
99.000 2.60691 0.08660 -0.11276 0.06044
Confidence Interval for the Slope
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidence t t-Value X Lower Upper
Value (%) Value StdErr Limit Limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
90.000 1.65443 0.01036 1.02016 1.04088
95.000 1.97490 0.01237 1.01815 1.04288
99.000 2.60691 0.01633 1.01419 1.04684
Two-Tailed Test for Slope Equal to One
H0: Beta = 1; Ha: Beta <> 1
------------------------------------------------------------
Null
Significance Test Critical Hypothesis
Level Statistic Value (+/-) Conclusion
------------------------------------------------------------
90.0% 4.87290 1.65437 REJECT
95.0% 4.87290 1.97481 REJECT
99.0% 4.87290 2.60671 REJECT
Two-Tailed Test for Ybar - Xbar = 0
H0: Ybar - Xbar = 0; Ha: Ybar - Xbar <> 0
------------------------------------------------------------
Null
Significance Test Critical Hypothesis
Level Statistic Value (+/-) Conclusion
------------------------------------------------------------
90.0% 0.64315 1.65437 ACCEPT
95.0% 0.64315 1.97481 ACCEPT
99.0% 0.64315 2.60671 ACCEPT
THE FORTRAN COMMON CHARACTER VARIABLE DEMI FIT HAS JUST BEEN SET TO ON
Iterative Weighted Deming Fit (Standard Errors by Jackknife)
Y1 versus Y2
Number of Observations: 162
Delta (Ratio of Variances): 1.00000
Sum of Squares Y: 138.18109
Sum of Squares X: 130.16739
Sum of Squares XY: 133.65385
Residual Standard Deviation: 21.99278
Estimate of Intercept: -0.02617
SD(Intercept): 0.03318
Jacknife Estimate of Intercept: -0.03254
Estimate of Slope: 1.03043
SD(Slope): 0.00626
Jacknife Estimate of Slope: 1.03062
Ybar: 4.16153
Xbar: 4.06403
Ybar-Xbar: 0.09750
SD(Ybar-Xbar): 0.15163
Jacknife Estimate of Ybar-Xbar: 31.58043
Confidence Interval for the Intercept
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidence t t-Value X Lower Upper
Value (%) Value StdErr Limit Limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
90.000 1.65443 0.05489 -0.08106 0.02873
95.000 1.97490 0.06553 -0.09169 0.03936
99.000 2.60691 0.08650 -0.11266 0.06033
Confidence Interval for the Slope
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidence t t-Value X Lower Upper
Value (%) Value StdErr Limit Limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
90.000 1.65443 0.01036 1.02006 1.04079
95.000 1.97490 0.01237 1.01806 1.04280
99.000 2.60691 0.01633 1.01410 1.04676
Two-Tailed Test for Slope Equal to One
H0: Beta = 1; Ha: Beta <> 1
------------------------------------------------------------
Null
Significance Test Critical Hypothesis
Level Statistic Value (+/-) Conclusion
------------------------------------------------------------
90.0% 4.85723 1.65437 REJECT
95.0% 4.85723 1.97481 REJECT
99.0% 4.85723 2.60671 REJECT
Two-Tailed Test for Ybar - Xbar = 0
H0: Ybar - Xbar = 0; Ha: Ybar - Xbar <> 0
------------------------------------------------------------
Null
Significance Test Critical Hypothesis
Level Statistic Value (+/-) Conclusion
------------------------------------------------------------
90.0% 0.64298 1.65437 ACCEPT
95.0% 0.64298 1.97481 ACCEPT
99.0% 0.64298 2.60671 ACCEPT
Date created: 03/10/2026 |
Last updated: 03/10/2026 Please email comments on this WWW page to [email protected]. | |