2.
Measurement Process Characterization
2.5. Uncertainty analysis
|
|||
Type B evaluations apply to both error and bias |
Type B evaluations can apply to both random error and bias. The
distinguishing feature is that the calculation of the uncertainty
component is not based on a statistical analysis of data. The
distinction to keep in mind with regard to random error and bias is
that:
|
||
Sources of type B evaluations |
Some examples of sources of uncertainty that lead to type B evaluations
are:
|
||
Documented sources of uncertainty from other processes |
Documented sources of uncertainty, such as calibration reports for
reference standards or published reports of uncertainties for physical
constants, pose no difficulties in the analysis. The uncertainty will
usually be reported as an expanded uncertainty, U, which is
converted to the standard uncertainty,
If the k factor is not known or documented, it is probably conservative to assume that k = 2. |
||
Sources of uncertainty that are local to the measurement process |
Sources of uncertainty that are local to the measurement
process but which cannot be adequately sampled to allow a statistical
analysis require type B evaluations. One technique, which is widely
used, is to estimate the worst-case effect,
a, for the source of interest, from
Following the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty of Measurement (GUM), the convention is to assign infinite degrees of freedom to standard deviations derived in this manner. |